Asymptomatic Brain Metastases Research Articles

Case report: Long-term intracranial effect of zimberelimab monotherapy following surgical resection of high PD-L1-expressing brain metastases from NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounted for the majority of lung cancer cases worldwide. Brain metastases (BM) frequently complicate NSCLC and portend a dismal prognosis. To control neurological symptoms, surgical resection is commonly followed by brain radiotherapy (RT). However, RT is often complicated by neurotoxicity. For patients with tumors that harbor positive driver genes, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are considered the standard of care. Nevertheless, treatment options for those without driver gene mutations are still debated. Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)/ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, as well as for those with asymptomatic BM. However, the effect of anti-PD-1 antibodies on active BM within such specific populations is undetermined. Herein we present a case of a 65-year-old patient with NSCLC and high PD-L1-expressing BM. The patient underwent surgical resection of BM followed by first-line monotherapy with 31 cycles of zimberelimab, a novel anti-PD-1 antibody, and has already achieved 24 months of progression-free survival and intracranial recurrence-free survival. To our knowledge, this is the first report regarding the intracranial effect of zimberelimab on BM from primary lung cancer. This case report might facilitate an understanding of the intracranial effects of different anti-PD-1 antibodies for such populations.

Abstract PO2-27-09: Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer

Abstract Background: Routine screening for brain metastases (BMs) is currently not recommended in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). There is a growing consensus on the need for the screening of BMs in HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) because 40% of patients experience BMs throughout the disease course and systemic treatment options with intracranial efficacy are now available. However, there is a lack of prospective study data on this matter. We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the role of brain MRI screening for the patient with metastatic BC. Methods: Patients who newly diagnosed metastatic HER2+ or TNBC were eligible. Screening brain MRI was planned at diagnosis and failure from first line and second line of systemic therapy. All patients underwent complete physical examination and comprehensive neurologic assessment at baseline and thereafter. Patients who diagnosed symptomatic BMs were dropped from the study and subsequent treatment including local therapies and survival data were collected. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients diagnosed with asymptomatic BMs. Results: A total of 147 patients were enrolled between Sep 2018 and Aug 2023 at Yonsei Cancer Center. The median age was 51 years (range, 29-80) and most patients (92.5%, n=136) had good performance status (ECOG 0-1). The tumor subtypes were as follows: TNBC, 51.0%; HER2 (ER-, HER2+), 29.3%; luminal-HER2 (ER+, HER2+), 19.7%. The cumulative incidence of asymptomatic BMs was 20.4% for overall patients; 24.0% for TNBC (18/75), 14.0% for HER2 (6/43), and 20.7% for luminal HER2 (6/29). Symptomatic detection of BMs during study period was 14.7% for TNBC, 18.6% for HER2, and 6.9% for luminal-HER2. Initial local treatment was stereotactic radiosurgery in 30 patients (58.8%), whole-brain radiation therapy in 14 patients (27.5%), surgical resection in 2 patients (3.9%) and 6 patients (11.8%) did not receive any treatment for BMs. After a median follow-up of 20.1 months, the median overall survival following a diagnosis of BMs was 23.7 vs 7.3 months (hazard ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.95; P = .04) in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic BMs, respectively. Conclusions: We identified approximately 20% of patients with HER2+ or TNBC as asymptomatic BMs. Emerging systemic therapies showed promising intracranial response would warrant the detection of asymptomatic BMs through routine MRI screening. Incidence of brain metastases by subtypes Citation Format: Gun Min Kim, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Min Hwan Kim, Seul-Gi Kim, Hyung Soon Park, Jong Hee Jang, Yong Bae Kim, Seung-koo Lee. Clinical impact of routine MRI screening for brain metastases in patients with HER2 positive or triple negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-27-09.

Abstract PO1-19-11: Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress)

Abstract Background The current first-line (1L) standard of care (SOC) for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is trastuzumab (T) plus pertuzumab (P) and a taxane. Despite advances in 1L SOC, most patients progress during maintenance therapy with T+P. Tucatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in combination with T and capecitabine for adults with HER2+ MBC, with and without brain metastases (BM). In HER2CLIMB, addition of tucatinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with HER2+ MBC and was well tolerated. Adding tucatinib also reduced the risk of disease progression or death in patients with untreated and/or active BM (Murthy et al. NEJM 2020, Curigliano et al. Ann Oncol 2022). HER2CLIMB-05 investigates whether adding tucatinib to 1L SOC as maintenance therapy will extend PFS while maintaining quality of life (QOL). Methods HER2CLIMB-05 (NCT05132582) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study evaluating tucatinib plus T+P as maintenance therapy for HER2+ MBC. Approximately 650 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients will have advanced HER2+ disease, no progression on 4–8 cycles of prior 1L SOC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1, and no or asymptomatic BM. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anti-HER2 and/or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor TKI (prior SOC for early BC is permitted) or inability to undergo contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either tucatinib or placebo twice daily, with T+P once every 21 days. Patients with hormone receptor-positive disease may receive endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints include OS, time to deterioration of health-related QOL, central nervous system PFS, safety, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. PFS and OS will be compared using a two-sided stratified log-rank test between treatment groups. Time-to-event endpoints will be summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method. PK and safety data will be summarized using descriptive statistics. Enrollment is ongoing in Austria, Chile, Greece, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the US, and several other European, APAC, and LATAM countries. This abstract was previously presented at ESMO-BC 2022, FPN (Final Publication Number): 415, by Veronique Dieras (reused with permission). Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Junji Tsurutani, Giuseppe Curigliano, Miguel Martín, Ciara O'Sullivan, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Konstantinos Tryfonidis, Libero Santarpia, Shan Yang, Véronique Diéras. Phase 3 Study of Tucatinib or Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab as Maintenance Therapy for HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (HER2CLIMB-05, Trial in Progress) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-11.

Abstract PS11-05: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in patients with HER2[+] or HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer and Pathologically Confirmed Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Results from Cohort 5 of the DEBBRAH Study

Abstract Background: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) occurs in approximately 5-15% of patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (ABC) and is associated with poor survival and a significant reduction in quality of life. The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown remarkable intracranial and extracranial activity, leading to its widespread clinical use. DEBBRAH is evaluating the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in pts with HER2[+] and HER2-low ABC with a history of brain metastases (BM) and/or LMC. Here, we report results from cohort 5 that included pts with pathologically confirmed LMC. Methods: DEBBRAH (NCT04420598) is a single-arm, open-label, five-cohort, phase 2 study conducted across 18 sites in Spain and Portugal. A total of 39 pts aged ≥18 years with pretreated HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC with stable, progressing, or untreated BM and/or LMC were enrolled in 5 cohorts: (1) HER2[+] ABC with non-progressing BM after radiotherapy and/or surgery; (2) HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC with asymptomatic untreated BM; (3) HER2[+] ABC with progressing BM after local treatment; (4) HER2-low ABC with progressing BM after local treatment; (5) HER2[+] or HER2-low ABC and LMC with positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology. Pts received 5.4 mg/kg T-DXd intravenously once every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Primary endpoint for cohort 5 was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response, clinical benefit rate (CBR) according to RANO-BM (intracranial lesions) and RECIST v.1.1 (extracranial and overall lesions); and safety and tolerability as per NCI-CTCAE v.5.0. OS was tested with the maximum likelihood exponential method (H0: median OS ≤2 months; H1: median OS≥6 months). We estimate that 7 pts are needed to attain an 80% power at the nominal level of one-sided α of 0.05. Results: Between Apr 14, 2021, and Apr 5, 2022, 7 pts were allocated into cohort 5. Median age was 57 (range, 42–69) years, 3 (42.9%) pts were HER2[+], 6 (85.7%) pts had synchronous extracranial metastases, 2 of whom (28.6%) also presented BM, and 3 (42.9%) pts had measurable disease. Median number of previous lines of therapy for advanced disease was 4 (range, 1-8) and no patient received prior local treatment for central nervous system involvement. At data cut-off (Apr 4, 2023), median follow-up was 12 months (range, 2.5-18.6). Median duration of treatment was 9.0 months (range, 2.1-18.6). Two (28.6%) pts remained on treatment: 1 HER2[+] and 1 HER2-low, after 18.6 and 12.0 months, respectively. Median OS rate was 13.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-NA, p< 0.001) meeting the primary endpoint. Among 5 pts with disease progression, none had intracranial progression. A total of 4 (57.1%) pts presented extracranial progression and 1 (14.3%) patient had clinical worsening. No objective responses were observed, but 5 out of 7 pts had prolonged stabilization (≥24 weeks) for an overall CBR of 71.4% (95% CI, 29.0-96.3) and a median PFS of 8.9 months (95% CI, 4.9-NA) according to RECIST v.1.1. The most common non-hematological treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade (G) were nausea (57.1%; 14.3% G3), fatigue (42.9%; 0% G3), vomiting (42.9%; 0% G3), headache (42.9%; 0% G3), and urinary tract infection (42.9%; 0% G3). Anemia (42.9%; 0% G3) and thrombocytopenia (28.6%; 14.3% G3) were the most frequent hematological TEAEs. No cases of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis were reported. Serious unrelated TEAEs occurred in 4 (57.1%) of 7 pts, and 1 patient experienced a related serious TEAE (nausea G3). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: T-DXd showed promising activity with no new safety concerns in HER2[+] and HER2-low pts with previously untreated, pathologically confirmed LMC. These encouraging data warrant further investigation to address the unmet need in this difficult-to-treat condition. Citation Format: Marta Vaz Batista, José Manuel Pérez-García, Laia Garrigós, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Patricia Cortez-Castedo, Fabriccio Racca, Salvador Blanch, Manuel Ruíz - Borrego, Adela Fernández, María Fernández-Abad, Vega Iranzo, Maria Gion, Griselda Martrat, Daniel Alcalá-López, Jhudit Pérez-Escuredo, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Sofía Braga, Javier Cortés. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in patients with HER2[+] or HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer and Pathologically Confirmed Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Results from Cohort 5 of the DEBBRAH Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-05.

Pembrolizumab response in stage IV luminal-type breast cancer with high microsatellite instability: a case report

BackgroundPembrolizumab (PEM), an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), is often used for triple-negative breast cancer, but can also be used to treat solid tumors that exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-High). However, patients with breast cancer rarely have MSI-High, the use of PEM in such cases in clinical practice is uncertain due to lack of sufficient supporting data. Here, we report the case of a premenopausal woman in who received PEM for MSI-High luminal-type breast cancer.Case presentationA 40-year-old premenopausal Asian woman was diagnosed with stage IIA (T2N0M0) breast cancer and had an Oncotype DX recurrence score of 38. After surgery, she received 4 courses of chemotherapy with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide. After 3 months of tamoxifen therapy, the patient complained of abdominal pain due to right iliac metastasis, and biopsy of the metastatic lesion showed of luminal type; she was sequentially treated with fulvestrant, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and an anticancer drug (TS1), but over the next year, metastasis to the bone and para-aortic lymph nodes increased. Tumor was MSI-High; PEM was started, and after three courses, bone metastases were reduced, para-aortic lymph node metastases resolved, opioids were discontinued, and the patient returned to society; PEM was administered for 1 year with no worsening of bone metastases on imaging. Asymptomatic brain metastasis less than 1 cm was detected and gamma knife was performed. Six months after completion of PEM, the patient is working with no new lesions.ConclusionWe report a case of luminal-type breast cancer with bone metastases and MSI-High, which was treated with PEM and showed a rapid therapeutic response.

Serplulimab monotherapy in extensive-stagesmall-cell lung cancer with brain metastasis: a case report.

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with limited treatment options, especially for extensive-stage (ES) patients. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with ES-SCLC and asymptomatic brain metastasis who opted for immune monotherapy with serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). After four cycles, the patient achieved a confirmed partial response and a progression-free survival of over 1 year. Moreover, we observed a consistent decline in tumor biomarkers, and brain MRI indicated reduced metastatic activity. Remarkably, the patient tolerated the treatment well, with only mild diarrhea. This case highlights serplulimab's potential as a first-line treatment in select ES-SCLC patients, emphasizing the importance of further research on immunotherapy predictive biomarkers.

Melanoma Brain Metastases: Immunotherapy or Targeted Therapy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Background. Brain metastases are one of the leading causes of death in melanoma patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to look at the variables that affect melanoma patients’ intracranial treatment responses to immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus up to December 2023 was conducted to identify trials investigating treatment response of melanoma brain metastasis. This meta-analysis presents summary estimates (SEs) of treatment response and odd ratios (ORs) for the comparison between symptomatic and asymptomatic metastases. Generalised linear mixed models were used for the SE of the proportion of clinical responses and 95% CIs are reported. We investigated between-study heterogeneity using meta-regression. Results. We included 19 independent clinical trials for a total of 1074 patients with brain metastases. The SE of the overall response was 36% 95%CI [27%; 47%], I2 = 84%, similar to the SE for symptomatic metastases: SE = 29% 95%CI [16%; 47%], I2 = 80%. A significantly higher response of symptomatic metastases was observed between patients who had previously received immunotherapy compared to those who had not (47% vs. 9%, p-value = 0.001). The SE was greater for asymptomatic metastases (38% 95%CI [29%; 49%], I2 = 80%), and among these, patients that received the combo-immunotherapy importantly responded more than those who had received monotherapy (45% vs. 26.1%, p-value = 0.002). The major limit of our analysis is the absence of data about the specific intracranial response separately in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in seven studies. Conclusions. This study shows the importance of starting immunotherapy as early as possible in asymptomatic patients. Randomised trials with greater statistical power are needed to find the best strategies for symptomatic and asymptomatic brain metastases.

ROS1 Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient with Brain Metastases Who Overcame Crizotinib Resistance with Lorlatinib: Case Report

Background: ROS1-positive patients account for 1-2% of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Crizotinib is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated in first line treatment of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC. However, crizotinib resistance is frequent within the first 12 months of treatment. Lorlatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor of ROS-1 recently indicated for metastatic or locally advanced crizotinib-resistant NSCLC. Case report: We report a case of a 43-year-old female patient with no medical history, diagnosted with stage IVB NSCLC including asymptomatic brain metastasis, and harboring ROS1 rearrangement. Within the first three months of starting crizotinib, the patient showed on CT scan evaluation new bone and brain metastases. Lorlatinib in the second line revealed a noteworthy improvement in metastasis and primary lesion. Conclusion: Brain metastases frequently occur in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC at the time of diagnosis and treatment course. However the efficacy of crizotinib might not translate to intracranial control of the disease, one of the cause of resistance to this drug.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases: 7-year outcomes and quality of life from the multicenter phase III NIBIT-M2 trial

BackgroundThe primary analysis of the phase III NIBIT-M2 study showed a 41% 4-year overall survival (OS) of melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. MethodsHere, we report the 7-year efficacy outcomes and the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) analyses of the NIBIT-M2 study. ResultsAs of May 1, 2023, at a median follow-up of 67 months (mo), the median OS was 8.5 (95% CI: 6.6–10.3), 8.2 (95% CI: 2.1–14.3) and 29.2 (95% CI: 0–69.9) mo for the fotemustine (F) Arm A, ipilimumab plus fotemustine Arm B, and ipilimumab plus nivolumab Arm C, respectively. The 7-year OS rate was 10.0% (95% CI: 0–22.5) in Arm A, 10.3% (95% CI: 0–22.6) in Arm B, and 42.8% (95% CI: 23.4–62.2) in Arm C. HRQoL was preserved in all treatment arms. Most functional scales evaluated from baseline to W12 were preserved, with a lower mean score decrease for EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and an increase for EORTC QLQ-Brain neoplasm (BN20) in patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab. ConclusionsWith the longest follow-up available to date in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, the NIBIT-M2 study continues to show persistent therapeutic efficacy of I ipilimumab plus nivolumab while preserving HRQoL.

POLARIS: A phase 2 trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib evaluating high-dose and standard-dose regimens in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma with brain metastasis

Abstract Background POLARIS (phase 2 [ph2]; NCT03911869) evaluated encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) in combination with binimetinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) in BRAF/MEK inhibitor-naïve patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma with asymptomatic brain metastases. Methods The safety lead-in (SLI) assessed tolerability for high-dose encorafenib 300 mg twice daily (BID) plus binimetinib 45 mg BID. If the high dose was tolerable in ph2, patients would be randomized to receive high or standard dose (encorafenib 450 mg once daily [QD] plus binimetinib 45 mg BID). Otherwise, standard dose was evaluated as the recommended ph2 dose (RP2D). Patients who tolerated standard dosing during Cycle 1 could be dose escalated to encorafenib 600 mg QD plus binimetinib 45 mg BID in Cycle 2. Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics were examined. Results RP2D was standard encorafenib dosing, as >33% of evaluable SLI patients (3/9) had dose-limiting toxicities. Overall, of 13 safety-evaluable patients (10 SLI, 3 ph2), 9 had prior immunotherapy. There were 9 treatment-related adverse events in the SLI and 3 in ph2. Of the SLI efficacy-evaluable patients (n = 10), 1 achieved complete response and 5 achieved partial responses (PR); the brain metastasis response rate (BMRR) was 60% (95% CI: 26.2, 87.8). In ph2, 2 of 3 patients achieved PR (BMRR, 67% [95% CI: 9.4, 99.2]). Repeated encorafenib 300 mg BID dosing did not increase steady-state exposure compared with historical 450 mg QD data. Conclusions Despite small patient numbers due to early trial termination, BMRR appeared similar between the SLI and ph2, and the ph2 safety profile appeared consistent with previous reports of standard-dose encorafenib in combination with binimetinib.

Prevalence of asymptomatic brain metastases in metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer: Treatment implications for resource-constrained settings

Abstract Background: Brain metastases (BM) are common in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, routine neuroimaging in asymptomatic patients with metastatic NSCLC is controversial as there is no conclusive evidence of benefit from the detection and treatment of asymptomatic BM. Herein, we evaluated the prevalence of asymptomatic BM and its treatment implications in a resource-limited setting. Methods: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC (NS-NSCLC) were included. Subjects who already had clinical or radiological features suggestive of BM were excluded from the study. All eligible subjects underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Management of the detected BM was at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Results: Among 809 subjects who were screened, 100 (12.4%) were included in the study and underwent MRI. BM was present in 30 (30%) of the subjects and absent in the remaining 70 subjects. A majority of BM were multiple (70%), involved the frontal lobe commonly (73.3%), and had a mean (standard deviation) size of 13.2 (7.3) mm. Detection of BM resulted in a treatment alteration in 17 (17%) of the study subjects (brain irradiation, n = 17, change in targeted therapy, n = 3) with BM. There was no difference in survival of patients who underwent treatment alteration for management of BM compared to those who did not (P = 0.132). Conclusions: About one-third of patients with metastatic NS-NSCLC had BM in MRI despite the absence of symptoms. Despite treatment of the majority of the patients with BM with brain irradiation, there was no demonstrable survival benefit. Hence, we conclude that although routine neuroimaging of asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic NSCLC may result in treatment alteration (primarily brain irradiation) in a small proportion of patients, it may not influence outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

Abstract C025: Trial in progress: First-in-human study of BBT-207 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation after treatment with EGFR TKI

Abstract Background: There is a high unmet need for an effective therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following osimertinib or other 3rd generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure, especially when resistance is driven by the occurrence of the C797S mutation. BBT-207 is a fourth-generation EGFR inhibitor. Preclinically BBT-207 has shown activity against treatment-emergent complex EGFR mutations containing T790M and/or C797S as well as drug-naïve mutants providing a possibility to overcome resistance to prior TKIs. Activity to intracranial lesions is also anticipated from animal models. Methods: Study BBT207-ONC-001 is an open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, pharmacodynamic characterization, and preliminary antitumor activity of BBT-207 monotherapy in approximately 92 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. It consists of 3 phases: Phase 1a (dose escalation), phase 1b (recommended phase 2 dose selection), and phase 2 (dose expansion). Key eligibility criteria include patients ≥18 years of age with advanced stage and refractory NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, documented partial response, complete response, or durable stable disease after treatment of an EGFR TKI, and previous treatment with all standard therapeutic options and at least one third-generation EGFR TKI. There is no limit on the number of previous treatments received. Phase 1a requires confirmation that the tumor harbors a classical EGFR mutation (19Del or L858R), and phase 1b and phase 2 require confirmation that the tumor or the blood harbors complex EGFR mutations containing C797S. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases who are on stable dose of corticosteroid are eligible. Primary endpoints are to determine recommended dose range (RDR) which is defined between the minimal reproducibly active dose, and the maximum tolerated dose or maximum administered dose and to characterize the overall safety and tolerability of BBT-207 (phase 1a); to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b); to evaluate preliminary antitumor activity with objective response rate (phase 2). Phase 1a dose escalation will be guided by Bayesian logistic regression model. The safety monitoring committee will determine RDR and two recommended dose levels (RDs) within the RDR to be explored in phase 1b.  In phase 1b, up to 20 patients will be randomized to each of the two RDs. At the end of phase 1b, a futility test will be performed in the dose level to be treated with the RP2D using Bayesian analysis. Phase 2 will be a non-randomized, open-label phase with up to 20 patients. Patients may receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment continuation beyond progression will be allowed if potential benefits are justified. Investigational new drug application was cleared by the U.S. FDA. Patient enrollment will begin in approximately August 2023 in the U.S. and Republic of Korea. Clinical trial information: NCT05920135. Citation Format: NaEun Jeon, Alexander Spira, Douglas Orr, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Misako Nagasaka, Jin Seok Ahn, Dong-Wan Kim, Yu Jung Kim, Jimin Cho, Agnes Jung, Eunsoo Jung, Chul-Won Kim, Taiguang Jin, Yong-Hee Lee, Sang-Yoon Lee. Trial in progress: First-in-human study of BBT-207 in advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation after treatment with EGFR TKI [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C025.

P2.03-03 Upfront or Delayed Cranial RT in Oncogene Mutated NSCLC with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

P2.03-03 Upfront or Delayed Cranial RT in Oncogene Mutated NSCLC with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

1084MO Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases: 7-year outcomes and quality of life from the multicenter phase III NIBIT-M2 trial

1084MO Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in melanoma patients with asymptomatic brain metastases: 7-year outcomes and quality of life from the multicenter phase III NIBIT-M2 trial

Advanced hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma with cecal metastasis: A case report.

The incidence of gastrointestinal metastases from breast cancer (BC) is low. We report a special case of Luminal B (Hormone Receptor positive [HR+]/Human Epidermal Growth Factor receptor 2-positive [HER-2+]) BC. The patient presented with asymptomatic brain metastases two years after radical surgery for modified breast cancer and developed right lower abdominal pain during relief therapy. Electronic gastroenteroscopy revealed inflammatory changes in the cecal mucosa. These changes were confirmed on pathology to be cecal metastasis from BC. The patient's condition was stabilised after treatment with an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC). For patients with BC who develop appendicitis-like symptoms after treatment for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, clinicians should be fully aware that the possibility of cecal metastasis needs to be considered, despite the very low probability of occurrence.

BSBM-03 A NOVEL COMBINED IMMUNOTHERAPY TO IMPROVE THERAPEUTIC RESPONSES IN SYMPTOMATIC BRAIN METASTASIS BASED ON TARGETING A SUBPOPULATION OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE ASTROCYTES

Abstract The diagnosis of brain metastasis involves high morbidity and mortality. Recently, immune checkpoint blockade antibodies (ICB) have shown clinical benefits mainly when applied to asymptomatic brain metastasis patients. However, variability is broad and responses to this therapy drop considerably when treating clinically relevant disease. Although potentially involved in the lack of response to immunotherapy, corticoids do not seem to fully explain this situation. Thus, it is currently unknown how to effectively target symptomatic brain metastases with immunotherapy. We previously reported a clinically relevant protumoral program driven by STAT3 activation in a subpopulation of reactive astrocytes during advanced stages of the disease. By further exploiting astrocyte heterogeneity, we have found a potential strategy to improve the number of responders to immunotherapy in symptomatic brain metastasis. Specifically, we have developed a comprehensive strategy including genetic and pharmacologic approaches to define a novel immunosuppressive axis involving astrocyte-secreted TIMP1 signaling on CD63+ CD8+ T cells. Based on these findings, we developed a combined immunotherapy to boost the systemic activation of T cells with ICB while blocking local TIMP1-dependent immunosuppression in various preclinical models. Furthermore, the detection of TIMP1 in the CSF provides a biomarker to select patients who would benefit the most from the combined immunotherapy. Even more, our data using Patient Derived Organotypic Cultures from fresh brain metastasis neurosurgeries confirmed that our therapeutic strategy is valid for symptomatic brain metastases from any primary source. In conclusion, our study has identified a novel combined immunotherapy that could be especially relevant for symptomatic brain metastases. Our findings have emerged from a strong scientific rationale whereby a specific subpopulation of astrocytes is shown to activate the local immunosuppressive environment for brain-infiltrating CD8+ T cells.

Intracranial Efficacy of Systemic Therapy in Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer.

There has been controversy over whether to radiologically follow up or use local treatment for asymptomatic small-sized brain metastases from primary lung cancer. For brain tumors without local treatment, we evaluated potential factors related to the brain progression and whether systemic therapy controlled the tumor. We analyzed 96 patients with asymptomatic small-sized metastatic brain tumors from lung cancer. These underwent a radiologic follow-up every 2 or 3 months without local treatment of brain metastases. The pathologies of the tumors were adenocarcinoma (n = 74), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 11), and small cell carcinoma (n = 11). The primary lung cancer was treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (n = 57) and targeted therapy (n = 39). Patients who received targeted therapy were divided into first generation (n = 23) and second or third generation (n = 16). The progression-free survival (PFS) of brain metastases and the overall survival (OS) of patients were analyzed depending on the age, tumor pathology, number, and location of brain metastases, the extent of other organ metastases, and chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS of brain metastases was 7.4 months (range, 1.1-48.3). Targeted therapy showed statistically significant PFS improvement compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy (p = 0.020). Especially, on univariate and multivariate analyses, the PFS in the second or third generation targeted therapy was more significantly improved compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.229; 95% confidence interval, 0.082-0.640; p = 0.005). The median OS of patients was 13.7 months (range, 2.0-65.0). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the OS of patients was related to other organ metastases except for the brain (p = 0.010 and 0.020, respectively). Three out of 52 patients with brain recurrence showed leptomeningeal dissemination, while the recurrence patterns of brain metastases were mostly local and/or distant metastases (94.2%). Of the 52 patients who relapsed, 25 patients received local brain treatment. There was brain-related mortality in two patients (2.0%). The intracranial anti-tumor effect was superior to cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of asymptomatic small-sized brain metastases with targeted therapy. Consequently, it becomes possible to determine the optimal timing for local brain treatment while conducting radiological follow-up for these tumors, which do not appear to increase brain-related mortality. Furthermore, this approach has the potential to reduce the number of cases requiring brain local treatment.

Efficacy of lazertinib for symptomatic or asymptomatic brain metastases in treatment-naive patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Protocol of an open-label, single-arm phase II trial.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation has a higher incidence of brain metastases than wild-type EGFR mutations. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), targets both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M-resistance mutations and has a higher brain penetration rate relative to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Therefore, osimertinib has become a preferred first-line therapy for advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. However, lazertinib, an emerging EGFR-TKI, has shown higher selectivity toward EGFR mutations and improved penetration of the blood-brain barrier compared to osimertinib in preclinical studies. This trial will evaluate the efficacy of lazertinib as a first-line therapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who have brain metastases, with or without additional local therapy. This is a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial. A total of 75 patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC will be recruited. Eligible patients will receive oral lazertinib 240 mg, once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity is detected. Patients with moderate to severe symptoms related to brain metastasis will simultaneously receive local therapy for the brain. The primary endpoints are progression-free survival and intracranial progression-free survival. Lazertinib, in combination with local therapy for the brain, if necessary, is expected to improve the clinical benefit in advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with brain metastases, as a first-line treatment.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: a critical appraisal focused on specific subpopulations.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the landscape of treatment of advanced melanoma in recent years. Based on the efficacy results of the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab is one of the first-line standard options for advanced melanoma along with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and, recently, nivolumab plus relatlimab. Counterbalancing its efficacy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab is associated with severe immune-related toxicity. This article will review the efficacy and safety of the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination in advanced melanoma across phase I, II, and III clinical trials that evaluated this approach. We also explore the benefit of the combination schedule across different subgroups of patients and possible predictive biomarkers for efficacy outcomes in order to elucidate which patients could be the best candidates for combination or single-agent therapy. Patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, asymptomatic brain metastases, or PD-L1-negative status appear to reach better survival outcomes with the combination relative to single-agent immunotherapy.

Cured or Not? Long-term Outcomes of Immunotherapy Responders. Focus on Melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated robust antitumor activity and tolerable safety in advanced melanoma. Data on long-term outcome of patients who benefited from this therapy and who are still free of progression despite ICI discontinuation is now available. We review here the characteristics of long-term ICI responders and address the critical question of cure. Long-term outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma enrolled in large phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials evaluating ICI in metastatic melanoma is now available. Durable responses, with more than 6 years of median follow-up, may persist after discontinuation. They occur more frequently in patients who achieved a complete response rather than in patients who had partial response or stable disease. Although long-term clinical benefit is more frequent in patients with high PDL-1 expression and smaller tumor burden, durable response may also be observed regardless of baseline characteristics. In patients with asymptomatic brain metastasis, combined immunotherapy (ipilimumab plus nivolumab) may also lead to long-term remission. Clinical trials confirm the durable antitumor activity of ICI. Although the hope for cure seems reasonable for many patients in this situation, late relapses may occur and no relapse-predictive biomarkers have been identified yet. Long-term responders who relapse can respond to a rechallenge of ICI although data are limited concerning the rate and the duration of this new response.